The King James
Controversy can be a very sore subject for Christians of different
denominations. Every Bible-believing church ought to take a stand for the
King James Bible of 1611 because of clear evidence of God's hand on the
inspiration and preservation of His Word by this Book. I plan (Lord willing)
for this page to grow in information. Currently, Presented here are several
main reasons for supporting the KJV.
Fables And Facts
About The King James Bible
Over the past few decades, new Bible
translations have been popping up like popcorn. Many strong Christians have
stood their ground and continued to believe, read, and study only the
Authorized King James Bible. Many others, however, have forsaken the Book
that God has used for centuries. Such people have fallen for smooth
advertising schemes and have actually started believing that the modern
versions are superior to the King James Bible. It's very sad that most
Christians today have not taken time to study the subject thoroughly enough
to see what is really happening.
Originally we published only one tract
about the King James Bible. The tract is titled How I Know The King James
Bible Is The Word Of God, and it presents some rather strong arguments
for the KJV. Then we offered a second tract, titled Let's Compare Bibles.
This tract shows how the modem Bible translations are literally attacking
God's word! Both of these tracts are still available, and are free upon
request.
Now, by the grace of God, we are able to offer a third tract on the King James issue. We call it Fables And Facts About The King James Bible. It's purpose is to better educate Christians about the KJV by clearing up some of the fables that have been spread by the critics. Far too many Christians are accepting the Authorized Version by faith alone, rather than working and studying to become more grounded in some of the basic FACTS about this important issue. The following information should be helpful to the believer who desires to be readily armed with TRUTH.
FABLE: The King James Bible was revised several times before 1800, so
modern translations are just additional revisions of the original King James
Bible of 1611.
FACT: The so-called "revisions" of the King James Bible prior to 1800 were to correct typographical errors, add notes, and omit the Apocrypha from between the Testaments. There were no changes in the actual TEXT of the King James Bible. The REAL changes (over 36,000 of them) didn't start until the modern revisionists came on the scene.
FABLE: The modern
translations are more accurate because they have been translated from older
and better manuscripts.
FACT: It is truly amazing how
so many Christians have bought into this lie without ever checking to see
WHAT these manuscripts are, WHERE they came from, and WHO wrote them. Its
also strange that no one seems to be asking the question, "Has God
honored these 'older' and 'better' manuscripts throughout Church History?"
The modem translations are based
on the work of two nineteenth century Greek scholars from England—B.F.
Westcott and F.J.A. Hort. Westcott
and Hort, who were deeply involved in the occult, hated the Textus
Receptus Greek text from which the King James Bible was translated, so they
conjured up THEIR OWN Greek text. This Westcott and
Hort Greek text was based primarily on two very corrupt fourth century
ROMAN CATHOLIC manuscripts: Codex Vaticanus (discovered in the Pope's
library in 1481) and Sinaiticus (discovered in 1859 in a trash can at St.
Catherine's monastery on Mt. Sinai). These are usually the "older" and
"better" manuscripts that we keep hearing so much about. These manuscripts
support most of the attacks in the new versions.
The Vaticanus is considered to be the most authoritative, although it is responsible for over thirty-six thousand changes that appear today in the new versions. This perverted manuscript contains the books of the pagan Apocrypha, which are not Scripture; it omits the pastoral epistles (I Timothy through Titus), the Book of Revelation, and it cuts off the Book of Hebrews at Hebrews 9:14 (a very convenient stopping point for the Catholic Church, since God forbids their priesthood in Hebrews 10!). The attacks on the Word of God found in these manuscripts originated in Alexandria, Egypt with the deceitful I work of such pagan Greek "scholars" as Origen and Clement of Alexandria.
Then in
313 A.D. the Roman emperor Constantine ordered fifty copies of "the Bible"
from Eusebius, the Bishop of Caesaria. Eusebius, being a devout student of
Origin's work, chose to send him manuscripts filled with Alexandrian
corruption, rather than sending him the true word of God in the SYRIAN
text from Antioch, Syria. So the corrupt Alexandrian text (also called the
"Egyptian" or "Hesychian" type text) found it's way into the Vatican
manuscript, then eventually into the Westcott and Hort Greek Text, and
finally into the new "Bible" versions in your local "Christian" bookstore.
Therefore, when you hear or read of someone "correcting" the King James
Bible with "older" or "more authoritative" manuscripts, you are simply
hearing someone trying to use a ROMAN CATHOLIC text to overthrow the
God-honored text of the Protestant Reformation and the great revivals. God
has never honored this corrupt text and He never will.
FABLE: New translations are needed to correct the errors and contradictions in the King James Bible.
FACT: No one has ever proven
that there are errors and contradictions in the KJV. Many "Christian"
colleges and preachers have a nasty habit of pointing out APPARENT
contradictions to their people, but these arguments have been disproven so
many times that it is nothing less than disgusting to hear them still being
used.
FABLE: New Translations are
needed to bring the archaic Old English language up to date. People have
trouble understanding the language of the King James Bible.
FACT: The King James language
is NOT hard to understand. Most of the so-called "archaic" words are
explained by the context of the passage or by comparing the passage with
other passages in the Bible where the same word is used. Heady and
high-minded people resent the King James language because it is plain and
simple, and it isn't in tune with their high-minded vocabulary. In fact, the
Grade Level Indicator of the Flesch-Kincaid research company says the King
James language is EASIER to understand than the new versions.
We certainly agree that the
language of the King James Bible is a unique language, but why shouldn't it
be? It's the WORD OF GOD!
FABLE: The King James Bible cannot
be infallible because the translators were only men, and all men are
sinners. The human element prevents the KJV from being infallible.
FACT: If this is true, then even the ORIGINAL AUTOGRAPHS in Hebrew and Greek were not infallible, because they too were penned by men!
The fact of the matter is that the King James translators were only INSTRUMENTS of preservation (which is exactly what they called themselves in the Dedicatory to the A.V. 1611) God has always been the Divine Preserver of His word (Psalm 12:6-7), but He has used men as tools and instruments of preservation, just as He uses men to teach and preach His words. When men humbly yield themselves to the will of God, God can use them to accomplish His will (Romans 12:1 2), and this is precisely what happened between 1604 and 1611.
FABLE: The King James translators added to the word of God, because the
italicized words in the KJV were not in the originals.
FACT: The Italics in the KJV
prove that the translators were HONEST in their work. They set the words in
italics so we'd know they were not in the manuscripts they were using.
Besides, no one has a copy of the
original manuscripts today, so no one knows for certain that the italicized
words aren't in them. In fact, there are many cases where we know that the
italicized words are justified. For example, notice in Deuteronomy 8:3 that
the word "word" is in Italics. However, when Jesus quotes this verse
in Matthew 4:4 he INCLUDES the italicized word! If the italicized word does
not belong in the Bible, why did the Lord Jesus quote it?
FABLE: The original King James Bible included the Apocrypha in the Old
Testament.
FACT: The King James translators knew the Apocrypha was not scripture, so they placed it BETWEEN the Old and New Testament as a HISTORICAL DOCUMENT, not as Scripture.
Friend, don't be deceived by the
crafty critics of God's word. LEARN THE FACTS! If you haven't read our other
tracts on the KJV, order them soon and read them. Arm yourself with the
facts!
If you've never received Jesus
Christ as your Savior, please send for a free copy of Understanding God's
Salvation Plan.
I have no greater joy than to hear that my children walk in truth (3 John 4:1)
Copyright 1996 James L. Melton
Additional copies of this tract may be obtained through Bible Baptist Church, P.O. Box 383, Martin, TN. 38237 A seven cent donation per tract is appreciated, but not required. Other literature also available
Books For Help In Understanding The KJV Controversy:
Final
Authority exposes the deceit behind many of the common charges leveled
against the A.D. 1611 Authorized Version. For instance, having heard of the
"inferior scholarship" of the King James translators, one discovers that Dr.
John Bois, chairman of the Old Testament committee at Cambridge, was reading
and writing Hebrew at age six. 
